Gay
groups
seeking
to
influence
United
Nations
proceedings
have
been
rebuked
again,
despite
new
support
from
the
Bush
administration.
A
coalition
of
nine
nations,
including
China
and
Iran,
last
week
derailed
attempts
by
the
International
Lesbian
&
Gay
Association’s
European
office,
and
other
gay
groups,
to
obtain
the
coveted
consultative
status.
The
special
status
enables
non-government
organizations
to
speak
at
United
Nations
meetings
or
lobby
member
nations.
Votes
by
the
19
nations,
which
occurred
May
16
and
May
17,
also
denied
consultative
status
to
a
German
gay
organization.
A
third
application,
from
a
Canadian
gay
organization,
was
deferred
May
19
because
no
French-to-English
translators
were
available.
Mark
Bromley,
a
spokesperson
for
international
human
rights
organization
Global
Rights,
said
the
votes
were
expected
but
upsetting.
“We
were
pretty
outraged,”
Bromley
said,
“as
were
a
lot
of
other
organizations.”
Bromley
said
that
no
major
gay
organizations
have
yet
received
consultative
status
from
the
United
Nations,
despite
several
attempts
by
various
domestic
and
foreign
groups
in
recent
years.
An
estimated
3,100
organizations
have
consultative
status
at
the
United
Nations.
Those
groups
primarily
participate
in
social
and
economic
discussions.
Despite
the
defeat,
applicants
said
they
were
pleased
and
thankful
that
Bush
administration
officials
chose
to
reversal
their
earlier
alliance
with
those
opposing
the
bids.
Philipp
Braun,
co-secretary
general
for
the
International
Lesbian
&
Gay
Association
in
Belgium,
said
U.S.
officials
opposed
applications
by
gay
groups
in
January.
“We
were
very
happy
that
the
U.S.
changed
its
position,”
he
said.
“We
just
want
to
have
a
voice
at
the
U.N.”
Earlier
vote
criticized
Following
the
January
vote,
several
human
rights
groups
and
congressmen
criticized
the
U.S.
for
not
supporting
two
gay
organizations
that
sought
consultative
status.
A
coalition
of
40
organizations — led
by
the
Human
Rights
Campaign
and
Human
Rights
Watch — urged
Bush
administration
officials
in
a
Jan.
25
letter
to
support
future
bids
by
gay
groups.
“As
long
as
human
rights
abuses
against
lesbian,
gay,
bisexual,
and
transgender
people
occur,
it
is
vital
that
non-governmental
organizations
working
on
their
behalf
are
given
a
place
and
voice
at
the
United
Nations,”
the
letter
says.
Congressman
Barney
Frank
(D-Mass.)
sent
letters
to
Secretary
of
State
Condoleezza
Rice
and
Colombian
President
Alvaro
Uribe
noting
his
disappointment
with
the
vote.
“There
was
clearly
no
reason,
other
than
the
fact
that
they
represented
gays
and
lesbians,
that
led
to
their
rejection,”
wrote
Frank,
who
is
gay,
in
his
letter
to
Uribe.
“Your
lack
of
respect
for
the
essential
dignity
of
myself
and
other
gay
and
lesbian
people
is,
as
I
said,
deeply
disappointing
to
me.”
Frank
said
this
week
he
was
pleased
that
both
the
United
States
and
Colombia
voted
May
16
and
May
17
to
support
the
gay
groups
seeking
consultative
status.
He
noted
the
next
step
is
winning
over
countries
that
continue
to
vote
against
the
applications.
“We
need
to
keep
at
it,
and
we
need
to
keep
the
pressure
up,”
he
said
in
a
telephone
interview.
“We
need
to
put
pressure
on
those
countries
[at
the
U.N.
that
oppose
these
applications],
and
people
in
the
United
States
with
ties
to
those
countries
should
put
pressure
on
them.”
Edgar
Vasquez,
a
Bush
State
Department
spokesperson,
said
the
U.S.
opposed
the
International
Lesbian
&
Gay
Association
application
in
January
because
of
the
organization’s
“past
history”
with
the
North
American
Man/Boy
Love
Association.
He
said
the
U.S.
supported
the
applications
considered
this
month
because
“there
were
different
groups
involved.”
Vasquez
said NAMBLA,
which
advocates
legalizing
sexual
relations
between
adults
and
minors,
was
a
founding
member
of
ILGA.
The
U.S.
supported
consultative
status
this
month
for
ILGA’s
European
office.
ILGA
severed
all
ties
to
groups
that
support
lowering
the
age
of
consent
for
gay
sex
following
its
decision
in
1994
to
expel
NAMBLA
from
its
ranks.
Angela
Clements,
a
Human
Rights
Campaign
public
policy
advocate,
said
she
was
thrilled
that
U.S.
officials
reversed
their
vote
and
supported
the
gay
groups.
“The
United
States
needs
to
act
as
a
beacon — not
as
an
obstacle — in
situations
like
these,”
she
said.
“We
took
a
good
step
in
the
right
direction
with
this
vote.”
Vote
can
be
appealed
Applications
for
consultative
status
did
not
die
with
last
week’s
vote.
Braun
said
the
United
Nations’
Economic
&
Social
Council
could
revisit
applications
by
the
International
Lesbian
&
Gay
Association,
plus
the
German
and
Canadian
groups,
later
this
year.
He
said
the
council
could
reconsider
or
overrule
the
committee
vote,
especially
if
the
groups
can
successfully
argue
discrimination
played
a
factor.
“It
has
something
to
do
with
discrimination,
in
the
sense
that
some
countries,
like
Iran,
don’t
want
to
deal
with
LGBT
issues,”
Braun
said.
“But
we
still
feel
that
it
is
crucial
that
LGBT
people
can
speak
in
their
own
names.”
Bromley
said
Global
Rights,
which
helped
the
three
gay
organizations
with
their
applications,
is
now
exploring
methods
to
appeal
the
committee
vote.
He
said
they
could
attempt
a
procedural
appeal,
because
the
hearing
was
not
properly
run,
or
a
substantive
appeal
to
address
discriminatory
issues.
“Our
hope
is
that
the
full
plenary
committee
will
actually
reconsider
these
votes
when
they
meet
in
July,”
Bromley
said.
“That’s
what
we’re
pushing
for — and
other,
supportive
governments
are
pushing
for
that.”
Clements
said
the
organizations
should
continue
to
fight
to
be
heard.
She
noted
that
“time
and
education”
is
needed
to
change
the
outcome
of
future
votes.
“I
think
that
we
can’t
just
wait
for
the
membership
to
be
friendly,”
she
said.
“We
need
more
global
allies.”